Close Please enter your Username and Password
Reset Password
If you've forgotten your password, you can enter your email address below. An email will then be sent with a link to set up a new password.
Cancel
Reset Link Sent
Password reset link sent to
Check your email and enter the confirmation code:
Don't see the email?
  • Resend Confirmation Link
  • Start Over
Close
If you have any questions, please contact Customer Service

TheGentleD0M 55M
2947 posts
11/24/2020 6:35 am
21st Century Girl

This post is only viewable by SpankTV members.
Join SpankTV now!

TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/24/2020 6:36 am


.

Propose The Reason
For
The Title


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/24/2020 6:40 am

Note: The original image is twice as large.

{ So you may need to look closely. }
{ Or you may not. }


tgd


spanks_and_wine 57M
228 posts
11/24/2020 9:30 am

OMG !
Is she not real ? Just a graphic generated either through photoshopping together bits of other pics or an automated artists impression of a human ?

I hadn't thought of it until mokyloks comments about skin tone.

And just in case I'm right - a very happy holiday season to the robot overlords. 😀


submale1955 68M
460 posts
11/24/2020 10:57 am

Could it be that she is less than 20 years old?


subaline 27F
23 posts
11/24/2020 12:06 pm

Most likely the idea was that she would be less than 20. Maybe she was when those pics were taken. But that would have been 12 years ago then.


Dave54321 61M
2679 posts
11/24/2020 1:51 pm

Don't tell me she's a replicant - (psst, when can I book her?).

No ring on her finger, but she's a young women. In any decade that doesn't
mean much. In any case posing for a photo like that she may prefere to
remove a ring.

Skin tones to me could be just down to position of lighting.
Hairless kitty, Although much more popular to day, but women have been
doing that since at least the seventies, & probably much, much longer.
Can't see a birth date tattoo, or any sign of a smartphone in the shot.

The make up appears to me to be in the modern style, which can sometimes
seem false/overdone. The more I look at the face now you got me questioning
if it's real. I do hope you are not going to tell us she is computer generated!

having said that I do hope you are going to tell us the answer.


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/24/2020 5:44 pm

    Quoting  :

She is an unusually "hippy" / very petite female, which could give a foreshortened illusion at the waist if you didn't know what to expect. Or not. Never thought of photoshopping.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/24/2020 5:47 pm

    Quoting spanks_and_wine:
    OMG !
    Is she not real ? Just a graphic generated either through photoshopping together bits of other pics or an automated artists impression of a human ?

    I hadn't thought of it until mokyloks comments about skin tone.

    And just in case I'm right - a very happy holiday season to the robot overlords. 😀
She is real (Georgia Jones), though your "OMG!" with unreality is noteworthy.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/24/2020 5:48 pm

    Quoting submale1955:
    Could it be that she is less than 20 years old?
I think she was in her mid-20s when this was taken.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/24/2020 5:49 pm

    Quoting subaline:
    Most likely the idea was that she would be less than 20. Maybe she was when those pics were taken. But that would have been 12 years ago then.
Interesting to have a female familiar with the "subject", who (as I stated above) was in her mid-20s when this was taken.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/24/2020 5:54 pm

    Quoting Dave54321:
    Don't tell me she's a replicant - (psst, when can I book her?).

    No ring on her finger, but she's a young women. In any decade that doesn't
    mean much. In any case posing for a photo like that she may prefere to
    remove a ring.

    Skin tones to me could be just down to position of lighting.
    Hairless kitty, Although much more popular to day, but women have been
    doing that since at least the seventies, & probably much, much longer.
    Can't see a birth date tattoo, or any sign of a smartphone in the shot.

    The make up appears to me to be in the modern style, which can sometimes
    seem false/overdone. The more I look at the face now you got me questioning
    if it's real. I do hope you are not going to tell us she is computer generated!

    having said that I do hope you are going to tell us the answer.
The replicant / not a living female / computer generated reaction is one I did not expect and one that is instructive.

With the answer to me being so obvious, and all of you not getting it, I'm now wondering if I am mistaken. I will need a day or two to decide if I want to appear foolish and write down what may be a huge error.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/24/2020 5:57 pm

Thank you.

I acknowledge the time taken for these answers. I was instructed by all of them, and appreciate the honest feedback more than you all know.

(truly ... ) Thanks for visiting.


tgd


subaline 27F
23 posts
11/25/2020 2:08 am

    Quoting TheGentleD0M:

    Interesting to have a female familiar with the "subject", who (as I stated above) was in her mid-20s when this was taken.

    Thanks for visiting.

    tgd

Just a little googling . And yes I came across her stage name too, which you mentioned in your answers.


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/25/2020 6:11 am

    Quoting  :

To be candid, I do not want to let myself think, that I can think what a girl thinks who is that beautiful and has done porn for her entire adult life (and dated Charlie Sheen when he had AIDS). That is dangerous territory, one step away from a life of food delivery and an ever growing Wall of Worship.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/25/2020 6:12 am

    Quoting subaline:
    Just a little googling . And yes I came across her stage name too, which you mentioned in your answers.
Well, thank you again for the energy invested in the post and your answer.
All the best to you and your searches.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/25/2020 6:17 am

Reviewing the post as I have, I now also wonder if the photographer knew he had located the perfect color palatte for his subject, or was he simply incredibly lucky?

Thoughts on that are welcome also.
(Perhaps a 2nd post).


tgd


Dave54321 61M
2679 posts
11/25/2020 1:13 pm

When I first looked at the photo, before I read your question, I just thought,
Wow, she's fantastic! The replicant comment was a joke of course, but with regard
to computer generated. They can do such amazing things, like putting dead
film stars in TV ads.

Anyway I think the penny has droped. If I'm right, yeah she knows, & she doesn't
care.

Are you perhaps refering the fact you can see her anus in the photo?

If you are suggesting, this is a 21st century thing. I would agree that it's become much
more prevelant this century, but although more rare, shots showing the anus have been
around for awhile. The first one I saw was in the 70's, but I believe a lot more of the
models would have been reluctant to pose in that way last century.

Please let me know if I'm right, or tell us what we've missed if it's something else.


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/26/2020 10:16 am

    Quoting Dave54321:
    When I first looked at the photo, before I read your question, I just thought,
    Wow, she's fantastic! The replicant comment was a joke of course, but with regard
    to computer generated. They can do such amazing things, like putting dead
    film stars in TV ads.

    Anyway I think the penny has droped. If I'm right, yeah she knows, & she doesn't
    care.

    Are you perhaps refering the fact you can see her anus in the photo?

    If you are suggesting, this is a 21st century thing. I would agree that it's become much
    more prevelant this century, but although more rare, shots showing the anus have been
    around for awhile. The first one I saw was in the 70's, but I believe a lot more of the
    models would have been reluctant to pose in that way last century.

    Please let me know if I'm right, or tell us what we've missed if it's something else.
I wasn't condemning anyone with my notation about the replicant perspective. I was simply stating in another way, that, yunno, she's fantastic! Perhaps so much so that one (us guys) can't really believe it. I know I can't believe that a woman that beautiful has spent her entire adult life in porn. How utterly screwed up her insides must be.

As for the the title-ing, my purpose with the photo was not that you can see her asshole. (Even though, in actual fact, you really can't?)

Happy Thanksgiving.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
11/28/2020 11:13 am

    Quoting  :

The subject is (was) pretty extraordinary.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd


Onehour 64M

12/1/2020 4:49 am

Every man's dream.


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
12/1/2020 7:52 pm

Yes, apart from her lifetime in porn, she has the look of gorgeousness.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd


TheGentleD0M 55M
4082 posts
12/3/2020 3:18 am

    Quoting  :

I thought it was so obvious.
This confirms I was mistaken.

Thanks for visiting.


tgd



Become a member to comment on this blog